Communication skills
Communication skills, breaking bad news, counselling and the doctor–patient relationship
Communication for FCPS Part 1: consultation structure, questioning, empathy, breaking bad news with SPIKES, counselling and relationship models. Covers behaviour change, adherence, collusion, angry patients, interpreters, gifts and conflicts of interest.
Why communication matters
- Good communication improves diagnostic accuracy, adherence, satisfaction and outcomes, and reduces complaints and litigation. Most complaints against doctors concern communication rather than technical skill.
- A good doctor–patient relationship rests on trust, empathy, respect, honesty, confidentiality and listening.
Structure of a consultation
- Calgary–Cambridge model: initiate the session, gather information, examine, explain and plan, close; while providing structure and building the relationship throughout.
- Closing includes safety-netting (what to do if things change) and checking the patient is satisfied with the plan.
- ICE: explore the patient's Ideas, Concerns and Expectations.
- Biopsychosocial model: illness is understood through biological, psychological and social factors, not disease alone (the biomedical model).
Questioning and listening
| Technique | Use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Open question | Start; let the patient tell the story | "Tell me about the pain." |
| Focused question | Narrow down while still open | "What makes it worse?" |
| Closed question | Specific facts at the end | "Does it wake you at night?" |
| Leading question (avoid) | Suggests the answer | "The pain goes to your arm, doesn't it?" |
| Reflection and summary | Shows listening, checks accuracy | "So the pain started after meals..." |
- Behaviours to avoid in an interview: interrupting early, leading or multiple questions, medical jargon, judgemental comments, looking at the screen or phone, premature reassurance.
- Active listening: attentive silence, eye contact, nodding, picking up verbal and non-verbal cues, paraphrasing and summarising. Non-verbal behaviour (posture, tone, facial expression) carries much of the emotional message.
- Check understanding with chunk and check and teach-back. For language barriers use a professional interpreter, not family members (and never children), especially for sensitive or complex matters.
- Face-to-face verbal communication supported by written information is the most effective way to explain a diagnosis or plan.
Empathy versus sympathy
- Empathy is understanding the patient's feelings from their point of view and showing that understanding. Sympathy is feeling sorry for them.
- The empathic response names the emotion and invites more: to "I'm scared this lump is cancer", the best reply is "You sound worried. Can you tell me more about what is worrying you?" Premature reassurance ("I'm sure it's nothing") or immediate facts close the conversation.
Breaking bad news: SPIKES
| Step | What to do |
|---|---|
| S, Setting | Private room, sit down, no interruptions (phone handed over), tissues, a relative or friend if the patient wishes, enough time |
| P, Perception | Find out what the patient already knows or suspects |
| I, Invitation | Ask how much detail they want now |
| K, Knowledge | Give a warning shot, then information in small chunks and plain words; check understanding |
| E, Emotions | Allow silence, acknowledge and respond to emotion with empathy |
| S, Strategy and summary | Plan next steps, realistic hope, summary, follow-up, contact details and written information |
- Reactions include shock, denial, anger, tears and bargaining; respond to the emotion before giving more facts.
- Collusion: when relatives ask that the patient not be told, explore their fears and explain your duty; ask the patient how much they want to know. A capable patient who asks must be told honestly, while a patient's own wish not to know is respected.
Counselling
- Counselling helps a person explore their problem and reach their own decision; the counsellor does not decide for them.
- Person-centred approach: empathy, unconditional positive regard and genuineness (congruence).
- Non-directive counselling (for example genetic counselling): balanced information without pushing a choice.
- Pre- and post-test counselling for HIV and genetic tests.
- Fertility counselling: about 80–85% of couples conceive within one year of regular unprotected intercourse and over 90% within two years, so investigation usually starts after one year (earlier if the woman is over 35 or there is a known problem).
Behaviour change
- Stages of change: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, with possible relapse. Match the intervention to the stage (raise awareness in precontemplation; build a plan in preparation).
- Motivational interviewing: express empathy, develop discrepancy between goals and behaviour, roll with resistance, support self-efficacy; uses open questions, affirmations, reflective listening and summaries.
- Brief intervention for alcohol: feedback, responsibility, advice, a menu of options, empathy, self-efficacy.
- Health belief model: perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and barriers, cues to action and self-efficacy predict health behaviour.
Models of the doctor–patient relationship
| Model | Doctor | Patient | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activity–passivity | Acts on the patient | Passive recipient | Unconscious trauma, emergency, anaesthesia |
| Guidance–cooperation | Advises | Follows advice | Acute illness, infection |
| Mutual participation | Helps the patient help themselves | Active partner | Chronic disease (diabetes), rehabilitation |
- Shared decision-making is the modern ideal: the doctor brings evidence, the patient brings values; decision aids help.
- Paternalistic care (doctor decides) is appropriate only when the patient cannot take part.
- Transference: the patient projects feelings about past figures onto the doctor; countertransference is the doctor's emotional reaction to the patient.
- Sick role: rights (exemption from normal duties, not blamed for the illness) and obligations (to want to get well and to seek and cooperate with help).
Adherence
- Compliance (adherence) is the extent to which a patient's behaviour (taking medicines, following diet or lifestyle advice, attending appointments) matches agreed medical advice. About half of patients with chronic illness do not take medicines as prescribed.
- Factors that worsen adherence: complex regimens, many daily doses, side effects, poor understanding, health beliefs, cost, depression, cognitive impairment, poor rapport.
- The single most effective step for an elderly man missing doses on eight tablets five times a day is to simplify the regimen (fewer drugs, once or twice daily, combination tablets), plus pill organisers and clear written instructions. Poor adherence is often mistaken for treatment failure.
Difficult situations and professional boundaries
- Angry patient: stay calm, ensure safety, listen without interrupting, acknowledge feelings, apologise for distress (not an admission of liability), explain, agree a plan, inform about the complaints procedure.
- Errors: duty of candour: tell the patient, apologise, explain, report and learn.
- Gifts and conflicts of interest: decline any gift, trip or payment linked to prescribing; prescribing must be based only on the patient's interest. Declare unavoidable interests.
- Adapt communication for hearing impairment, learning disability and telephone consultations (confirm identity, safety-net).
Remember Open questions first, empathy before information, warning shot before bad news, and the patient decides.
Exam trap The activity–passivity model is for the unconscious patient; mutual participation is for chronic disease.
Exam trap Use a professional interpreter, not a relative, for important discussions.
How FCPS asks about this
- "I'm scared this lump is cancer": empathic reply: "You sound worried. Tell me more?"
- First step in breaking bad news: a private, uninterrupted setting with time; then establish what the patient knows.
- Unconscious trauma patient: activity–passivity model.
- Elderly man missing doses on a complex regimen: simplify to fewer daily doses.
- Drug company offers a trip for prescribing more: decline; conflict of interest.
- Sick role: being excused from usual obligations, with a duty to seek help and want to recover.
- Best statement about counselling: it helps patients reach their own informed decisions.
Test yourself on this topic
5 of the 30 questions in our bank on this topic. Choose an answer to see why every option is right or wrong.
A doctor must tell a patient that his biopsy shows cancer. Using the SPIKES framework, what should be done immediately before giving the diagnosis?
Answer: Perception, invitation, warning
SPIKES: Setting—private, uninterrupted, seated, with a relative if the patient wishes; Perception—ask what the patient understands ('What have you been told about the tests?'); Invitation—ask how much information they want; Knowledge—give a warning shot ('I'm afraid the results are not what we hoped'), then the news in clear, jargon-free language, in small chunks, checking understanding; Emotions—respond with empathy, allow silence, acknowledge feelings; Strategy and Summary—agree a plan, next steps and follow-up. Families should not be told before the patient without the patient's consent, and collusion requests should be explored sensitively.
SPIKES
- Setting: private, seated
- Perception: what do they know?
- Invitation: how much do they want to know?
- Knowledge: warning shot, plain words, small chunks
- Emotions: empathy, silence
- Strategy and summary
Remember Ask before you tell.
Why the other options are wrong
- Give all treatment options Plans come after the news and emotions.
- Prognosis in percentages Prognosis only if the patient wants it, later.
- Tell the family first Breaches confidentiality without consent.
- Read the report and leave Poor practice.
A pharmaceutical company offers a doctor an expensive foreign trip if he prescribes more of their drug. What should he do?
Answer: Decline: conflict of interest
Doctors must not accept gifts or hospitality that could affect, or be seen to affect, their prescribing. Patient interests must come first, and prescribing should be evidence-based. Professional codes (including PMDC's) prohibit such inducements.
Conflicts of interest
- Decline inducements linked to prescribing
- Prescribe on evidence
- Declare any interests
Remember If it could sway your pen, say no.
Why the other options are wrong
- Accept, since everyone does it Common practice does not make it ethical.
- Accept but prescribe as usual The conflict of interest remains.
- Accept if the drug is effective Still an inducement.
- Accept if it includes a lecture An educational label does not remove the inducement linked to prescribing.
A junior doctor gave the wrong dose of a drug, but the patient was not harmed. What should she do?
Answer: Tell the patient and report it
Doctors should be open and honest when things go wrong (duty of candour), apologise, and report incidents and near misses so the system can learn. A blame-free reporting culture improves safety; altering records is dishonest misconduct.
Medication errors
- Be open and honest, apologise
- Report incidents and near misses
- Never alter records
Remember Tell, report, learn.
Why the other options are wrong
- Say nothing since no harm Near misses must still be reported.
- Correct the drug chart quietly Falsifying records.
- Blame the nurse Unprofessional.
- Wait to see if harm develops Delays honesty.
In a cohort, the incidence of MI is 12 per 1,000 per year in smokers and 4 per 1,000 per year in non-smokers. What is the attributable risk among smokers?
Answer: 8 per 1,000 per year
Attributable risk (risk difference) is the incidence in the exposed minus the incidence in the unexposed: 12 − 4 = 8 per 1,000 per year. It is the excess risk due to smoking in smokers, which would disappear if they had not smoked. The relative risk is 12 ÷ 4 = 3. The attributable risk per cent is 8 ÷ 12 = 67%, the proportion of disease in smokers due to smoking.
Risk measures
- Attributable risk: Ie − Iu
- Relative risk: Ie ÷ Iu
- AR%: (Ie − Iu) ÷ Ie
- AR guides public health impact
Remember Subtract for attributable, divide for relative.
Exam trap Relative risk shows strength of association; attributable risk shows how much disease could be prevented.
Why the other options are wrong
- 3 3 is the relative risk.
- 16 per 1,000 per year This adds the incidences.
- 67% 67% is the attributable risk per cent.
- 0.33 0.33 is the inverse of the relative risk.
A patient starts treating her doctor with the same anger she felt towards her strict father. What is this called?
Answer: Transference
Transference is when a patient unconsciously redirects feelings about important people in their past onto the doctor or therapist. Countertransference is the doctor's emotional reaction to the patient. Recognising both helps keep the relationship professional.
Transference
- Patient → doctor: transference
- Doctor → patient: countertransference
- Recognise it to stay professional
Remember Trans-ference: feelings transferred onto the doctor.
Why the other options are wrong
- Countertransference The doctor's feelings towards the patient.
- Projection Attributing one's own feelings to others.
- Displacement Shifting feelings to a safer target.
- Sublimation Mature channelling of impulses.
Where this sits in the CPSP syllabus
- Paper 1: Behavioural sciences and medical ethics, Communication skills, breaking bad news, counselling and the doctor-patient relationship